The Advanced Certified Scrum Developer (A-CSD) exam requires an understanding of various code and product quality metrics. These metrics help teams to assess the health of their codebase and the quality of their product over time. This post will compare and contrast three essential code and product quality metrics: Cyclomatic Complexity, Code Duplication, and Unit Test Coverage.
1. Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity, developed by Thomas J. McCabe, is a metric for the complexity of a program. It quantifies the number of linearly independent paths through a program’s source code, providing an objective measurement of a program’s complexity that can guide developers in managing and controlling their work. High cyclomatic complexity indicates a higher risk, which could indicate a potentially problematic code area.
The cyclomatic complexity of a section of source code is the count of the number of linearly independent paths through the code. For instance, if the source code has no control flow statements (e.g., if statements or for loops), its cyclomatic complexity would be 1 since there is only a single path through the code. On the other hand, if there are one or more if statements, the cyclomatic complexity would increase accordingly.
2. Code Duplication
Code duplication is another crucial code quality metric. It represents the percentage of duplicated lines in the source code. Duplication can be the root of many problems in software development, including higher maintenance costs and a higher probability of bugs.
Tools like SonarQube scan your source code for code duplication, along with code smells and bugs. If there is a high percentage of duplicated code, it’s usually a sign of poor coding practice and can often lead to problems down the line. Developers should strive to reduce code duplication as much as possible to maintain high-quality code.
3. Unit Test Coverage
Unit test coverage, often simply referred to as ‘coverage’, measures the proportion of a program’s codebase that is covered by unit tests. This metric is crucial because it provides an insight into the code quality and the potential risk of bugs or issues. It is a key metric to understand when preparing for the A-CSD exam.
In a perfect world, every line of code should be covered by at least one unit test. However, achieving 100% test coverage can often be unrealistic or unnecessary. Instead, aim for higher coverage and focus on testing the critical paths of your code. Tools like JaCoCo and Cobertura can help measure test coverage in many popular programming languages.
In Conclusion
In conclusion, all of these metrics are vital for assessing code and product quality. Cyclomatic complexity measures code complexity and can indicate areas of risk, while code duplication assesses maintainability. On the other hand, unit test coverage gives insight into potential risks and the code’s stability. It’s essential for an A-CSD candidate to understand these metrics and their role in maintaining high-quality code.
Practice Test
True or False: Code complexity, defect density and technical debt are all examples of code quality metrics.
Answer: True.
Explanation: These metrics are all used to measure the quality of the code in a software product, to identify any issues and potentially improve it.
The number of bugs found per lines of code is an example of which quality metric?
- A) Code Quality Metric
- B) Product Quality Metric
- C) Both
Answer: A) Code Quality Metric
Explanation: This is a code quality metric known as defect density, which allows teams to evaluate the quality of the code they write.
True or False: Customer satisfaction is a product quality metric.
Answer: True.
Explanation: Customer satisfaction is a metric used to measure the quality of the product from the user’s perspective. It reflects how well the product meets user expectations.
True or False: Code readability is a product quality metric.
Answer: False.
Explanation: Code readability is actually a code quality metric. It measures how easily other developers can understand and maintain the code.
What do product quality metrics measure?
- A) The efficiency and accuracy of code
- B) The overall performance of the product
- C) The cleanliness of the code
- D) The amount of technical debt
Answer: B) The overall performance of the product
Explanation: Product quality metrics measure the quality of the product from the end user’s perspective. This includes performance, reliability, and functionality.
Which of the following is NOT a product quality metric?
- A) Time to market
- B) Feature usage
- C) Code complexity
- D) User satisfaction
Answer: C) Code complexity
Explanation: Code complexity is a code quality metric, not a product quality metric.
True or False: All code quality metrics directly impact product quality metrics.
Answer: False.
Explanation: Although many code quality metrics can have an impact on product quality, not all of them directly affect product quality metrics. For example, code readability impacts the maintainability of the code, but might not directly affect the user’s experience or satisfaction with the product.
Multiple Select: Which of these are types of Technical Debt?
- A) Design Debt
- B) Testing Debt
- C) Code Debt
- D) Product Debt
Answer: A) Design Debt, B) Testing Debt, C) Code Debt.
Explanation: These are all types of technical debt which involve certain trade-offs and can impact both code and product quality in different ways.
Code Quality Metrics mainly provide information to:
- A) Developers
- B) End Users
- C) Stakeholders
Answer: A) Developers
Explanation: Code Quality Metrics are mostly concerned with factors such as simplicity, readability, and maintainability of the code which are primarily of interest to developers.
Which of the following is a common measure of Product Quality?
- A) Code simplicity
- B) Bug fix time
- C) Customer satisfaction
- D) Lines of code
Answer: C) Customer satisfaction
Explanation: Customer satisfaction measures the user’s experience and satisfaction with a software product, making it a key product quality metric.
Interview Questions
What are three popular code quality metrics used in software development?
Three popular code quality metrics include Cyclomatic Complexity, Maintainability Index, and Code Duplication.
How does Cyclomatic Complexity function as a code quality metric?
Cyclomatic Complexity measures the number of linearly independent paths through a program module. It helps to identify the complexity of a code.
What is the significance of Maintainability Index as a code quality metric?
Maintainability Index is an index that measures how maintainable (easy to support and change) your code is. It includes measurements such as lines of code, cyclomatic complexity and Halstead volume.
Can you explain how Code Duplication works as a code quality metric?
Code Duplication or code clones are sections of code that are very similar to each other. High levels of code duplication can make the codebase harder to maintain and more prone to bugs.
Can you compare and contrast Cyclomatic Complexity and Code Duplication as code quality metrics?
While both are important indicators of code quality, they measure different aspects. Cyclomatic Complexity measures the complexity of a program based on its control flow graph, and Code Duplication measures the redundancy in the code.
What are three popular product quality metrics used in software development?
Commonly used product quality metrics would be Defect Density, Customer Satisfaction Survey, and Time To Market.
Can you explain how Defect Density is a critical product quality metric?
Defect Density is a measure of the number of confirmed bugs in a software application or module during a defined period of development operation. Lower defect density indicates a higher quality product.
How significant is a Customer Satisfaction survey as a product quality metric?
Customer Satisfaction survey measures the satisfaction of the end user, which directly reflects the quality of the product. A high satisfaction rate signifies a high-quality product.
Can you elaborate on Time To Market as a product quality metric?
Time To Market measures the speed at which a company can launch a product. It is crucial for competitiveness and ROI, though haste can compromise quality.
Please compare and contrast Defect Density and Customer Satisfaction survey as product quality metrics?
While both are product quality metrics, they indicate different measures. Defect Density measures the number of defects per size of a software project, revealing technical quality, while a Customer Satisfaction survey measures users’ perception of the product quality.
Can you connect the Cyclomatic Complexity metric to a corresponding product quality metric?
Cyclomatic Complexity is connected to Defect Density. Higher complexity usually leads to higher Defect Density, as complex code can hide more bugs.
How would a high Maintainability Index impact the Time To Market product quality metric?
A high Maintainability Index, which indicates easier to maintain and modify code, could potentially reduce Time To Market. Code that is easier to update can lead to faster product launches.
How does having a high Code Duplication metric influence product quality metrics?
High Code Duplication can lead to a lower product quality. It can increase Defect Density – as bugs might get duplicated – and decrease Customer Satisfaction as it can lead to more faults.
Can a product have a high product quality metric but low code quality metric?
Yes, it’s possible, although not ideal. For instance, a product might have high Customer Satisfaction due to its functionality, even if the code has high cyclomatic complexity. However, the poor code quality might eventually result in a greater number of bugs and longer maintenance times, leading to lower product quality over time.
What does it infer if a product has a low Time To Market metric but a high Defect Density?
This suggests a rushed development process where speed was prioritized over quality, leading to a higher number of defects. It might satisfy immediate market demands, but the high Defect Density could adversely affect the product’s quality and long-term success.