Advanced Certified Scrum Masters (A-CSMs) have a crucial role in leading their Scrum Teams by facilitating meetings, fostering clear communication among team members, removing obstacles that block progress, and encouraging collaboration. As the de facto facilitator, the Scrum Master is the key person driving the team’s successful application of the Scrum Framework.
However, there are certain scenarios where the Scrum Master should step aside and not act as the facilitator for the Scrum Team. Let’s discuss two such examples.
When the Scrum Master Has a Conflict of Interest
A Scrum Master is supposed to be a neutral facilitator, helping to guide the team to find solutions to problems, but not pushing their own agenda or solutions. They should be creating a safe and trusting environment for the team, fostering collaboration and clear communication among team members.
If at any point the Scrum Master has a vested interest or personal stake in a specific outcome of the team’s decisions, they might consciously or unconsciously guide the team towards that outcome. This is a conflict of interest and it threatens the transparency and trust within the team. Under such circumstances, the Scrum Master should step back from the facilitator role.
For example, suppose the Scrum Master is also the Product Owner or holds a stake in a particular feature debated by the Scrum Team. They might tend towards driving the team to prioritize this feature. This could result in distortions in the product backlog, pressure on the development team, and overall impairment of team dynamics.
In such a scenario, the Scrum Master should refrain from acting as the facilitator to avoid favoring their personal interests.
When Other Team Members are More Competent in Certain Aspects
Scrum Masters are usually competent in managing the general processes and facilitating tasks. However, they might not be the most skilled or knowledgeable person for all types of tasks or topics that come up within the Scrum process.
In technical discussions or sessions where specialized knowledge is needed, it may be best for the Scrum Master to delegate the facilitation to a subject matter expert in the team. This can help in utilizing the team’s full potential and create a culture of shared ownership.
Consider a scenario where the team faces a complex technical problem. In such cases, the team’s senior developer or an expert in that problem domain may be better suited to facilitate discussions, guide problem-solving, or lead a focused exploration of possible solutions.
The Scrum Master can then take a back seat and let the appropriate team member take the facilitator role, promoting the principle of self-organizing teams intrinsic to the Scrum Framework.
Conclusion
Being a successful Scrum Master is about knowing when to lead and when to step back. It is crucial to remember that the ultimate goal of a Scrum Master is not to be the permanent leader but to foster an environment where every member feels confident enough to lead when their skills are needed. Recognizing the situations where they ought not to be the facilitator is a fundamental part of this process which cannot be underestimated.
Practice Test
True/False: The Scrum Master should always act as the facilitator for the Scrum Team.
Answer: False
Explanation: There are situations where the Scrum Master should not act as the facilitator. For instance, when there’s a conflict of interest or the team has become over-reliant on the Scrum Master.
What is an example when the Scrum Master shouldn’t act as the team’s facilitator?
- A) During the daily Scrum.
- B) During conflict resolution.
- C) When implementing the Scrum framework.
Answer: B) During conflict resolution.
Explanation: If the Scrum Master becomes a party in a conflict, it’s better to have an external facilitator to maintain an impartial resolution process.
Multiple Select: Which reasons could prevent a Scrum Master from acting as the team facilitator?
- A) Conflict of interest
- B) Overdependence on the Scrum Master
- C) Availability of a better-skilled facilitator in the team
Answer: A) Conflict of interest, B) Overdependence on the Scrum Master, C) Availability of a better-skilled facilitator in the team
Explanation: All these situations can potentially call for someone else to take on facilitator role.
True/False: Scrum Master can avoid to act as a facilitator when the team is new to the Scrum methodology.
Answer: False
Explanation: On the contrary, a new Scrum team needs guidance and facilitation from the Scrum Master until they become self-organizing and mature.
A Scrum Master should step back from facilitation when:
- A) Team adopts a new tool
- B) Carrying out the review meeting
- C) The team has become over-reliant on his/her facilitation
Answer: C) The team has become over-reliant on his/her facilitation
Explanation: If the team becomes too dependent, the Scrum Master may need to step back to encourage team’s self-organization.
True/False: A Scrum Master should not facilitate if they are also a contributor to the project.
Answer: True
Explanation: If the Scrum Master is also a project contributor, it could create a conflict of interest, and independent facilitation might be better.
When should a Scrum Master step back from the facilitation role?
- A) During retrospective meetings
- B) When there is a better-skilled facilitator in the team
- C) During the planning meetings
Answer: B) When there is a better-skilled facilitator in the team
Explanation: If someone else in the team has stronger facilitation skills, the Scrum Master can step back to maximize the team’s value.
True/False: It is advisable to always have an external facilitator during the conflict resolution.
Answer: False
Explanation: Scrum Master can act as a facilitator during conflict resolution, unless they are part of the conflict or there are other reasons not to.
Multiple Select: The Scrum Master should not act as a facilitator when:
- A) Implementing the Scrum framework
- B) There’s conflict within the team and the Scrum Master is involved
- C) Conducting daily stand-up meetings
Answer: B) There’s conflict within the team and the Scrum Master is involved
Explanation: In cases of personal conflict involving the Scrum Master, a neutral external party can be more effective.
True/False: A Scrum Master should not facilitate when he or she doesn’t have time.
Answer: True
Explanation: Facilitation requires time and attention. If the Scrum Master doesn’t have the bandwidth, it’s best to find another facilitator to ensure meetings are effective.
Interview Questions
What is the primary role of a Scrum Master in a Scrum Team?
A Scrum Master primarily acts as a facilitator and coach for the Scrum team, helping to resolve any issues or impediments that may disrupt the team’s progress and ensuring Agile principles are adhered to.
Can a Scrum Master act as the Product Owner in a Scrum Team?
No, the Scrum Master should not act as the Product Owner. The two roles have distinct responsibilities and combining them can lead to a conflict of interest.
When should a Scrum Master not act as the facilitator for the Scrum Team?
A Scrum Master should not act as the facilitator during Retrospective meetings where the team’s performance under his or her coaching is evaluated, or when there is a conflict of interest or bias that could influence the Scrum Master’s facilitation.
Why shouldn’t a Scrum Master facilitate a Retrospective meeting?
A Retrospective meeting often involves assessing the Scrum Master’s coaching and how it affects team progress. To avoid bias, another team member or external facilitator should lead these discussions.
Why is conflict of interest a concern when a Scrum Master also facilitates the Scrum Team?
A conflict of interest may arise if the Scrum Master’s personal or professional interests influence their decisions during facilitation. This could compromise the integrity of the Scrum process and affect team productivity.
Can a Scrum Master act as a team member within the Scrum team?
While it is technically possible, it is not recommended for the Scrum Master to also act as a team member because it could lead to a conflict of interest and blur the clear boundaries of roles and responsibilities within the Scrum framework.
What happens when a Scrum Master wears multiple hats within the Scrum team?
If a Scrum Master takes on multiple roles, it could lead to a lack of balance in responsibilities, conflicts of interest, or compromised efficiency and productivity.
What is the recommended method for facilitating a Retrospective meeting if the Scrum Master cannot facilitate?
If the Scrum Master cannot facilitate, another team member can take on this responsibility to ensure transparency and eliminate any perceived bias.
Should a Scrum Master facilitate a meeting if they have a vested interest in the outcome?
No, a Scrum Master should refrain from facilitating meetings where they have a vested interest to maintain impartiality and avoid conflicts of interest.
What other roles can conflict with the Scrum Master’s role as facilitator?
Roles that have decision-making power or managerial influence, such as Product Owner or team manager, can conflict with the Scrum Master’s role as facilitator. This is due to their potential to exert control over the outcome of the Scrum process.
If conflicts arise within the Scrum team, who should facilitate conflict resolution if not the Scrum Master?
If the Scrum Master is involved in the conflict, an objective third party, like another Scrum Master or Agile Coach, should facilitate conflict resolution to ensure fairness and impartiality.
What is the potential consequence if a Scrum Master continues to facilitate despite a conflict of interest?
If a Scrum Master continues to facilitate despite a conflict of interest, it could lead to poor decision-making, decreased team morale and potentially compromise the success of the project.
If a Scrum Master is not facilitating, what should their role be in meetings?
Even if a Scrum Master is not facilitating, they should still participate in the meeting as a team coach, providing guidance and support to team members when necessary.
In what instances is it acceptable for a Scrum Master to facilitate a meeting where they have a vested interest?
It is rarely acceptable for a Scrum Master to facilitate a meeting where they have vested interest, as it can threaten the unbiased environment required in Scrum meetings.
How can potential conflicts of interest be managed in a Scrum team?
To manage potential conflicts of interest in a Scrum team, roles and responsibilities should be clearly defined and adhered to. If a potential conflict arises, it should be addressed immediately with transparency and fairness.
extutorials.com