AWS offers a variety of services that span these two models and making an informed choice can dictate the success of your project. While both models have their benefits, they also have their limitations which are necessary to consider depending on your specific workload and use case.
Provisioned Services
Provisioned Services in AWS are those where you reserve (or provision) a certain amount of resources ahead of time. You can essentially think of this as reserving your own hardware. Examples of provisioned services in AWS include EC2 instances or RDS instances.
When you use provisioned services, you have a high level of control over the environment. You decide the specifications of the hardware and you have direct access to the underlying server. For instance, with an EC2 instance, you can choose the size of your instance, the number of CPUs, the amount of memory, and much more. This means that if your workload requires very specific configuration or tuning, you have the ability to do so.
However, this also means you have more responsibility for managing and maintaining the service. This includes patching the servers, managing networking, and ensuring the security of the environment. Additionally, because you pay for what you provision, you may end up with wasted capacity if your actual usage is less than what you’ve provisioned.
Here’s a table summarizing the benefits and limitations of provisioned services:
| Benefits | Limitations |
|---|---|
| High level of control | More management effort |
| Can accommodate specific workloads | Potential for wasted capacity |
Serverless Services
Serverless services, on the other hand, aim to abstract away the underlying infrastructure. With serverless, you don’t think about servers, you only think about your code and your data. Examples of serverless in AWS include Lambda for compute and DynamoDB for NoSQL databases.
When you use serverless services, AWS manages all of the infrastructure. You only pay for what use – when your code runs or when you store data. When your code is not running, there is no cost. This means you have less management responsibility and can focus more on your application code.
However, the serverless model also limits the control you have over the environment. You can’t tweak the server configuration because there is no server to tweak. Furthermore, because the infrastructure is abstracted away, debugging can be more challenging as you have less visibility into the underlying system.
Here’s a table summarizing the benefits and limitations of serverless services:
| Benefits | Limitations |
|---|---|
| Minimal management effort | Less control over the environment |
| Only pay for what you use | Debugging can be more challenging |
Final Thoughts
To conclude, whether to use provisioned services or serverless services depends on your specific needs. If you need a high level of control and can handle management tasks, provisioned services might be for you. If you want minimal overhead and only want to pay for what you use, serverless might be the way to go. In reality, many applications will use a mix of both. In the AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate exam, make sure you understand the trade-offs and can reason about when to use each model.
Practice Test
True or False: Serverless services typically have higher upfront costs than provisioned services.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: Serverless services are typically pay-as-you-go, meaning lower upfront costs compared to provisioned services.
A key tradeoff between provisioned and serverless services is:
- A) Security
- B) Cost
- C) Speed
- D) Scalability
Answer: B) Cost
Explanation: While security, speed and scalability can be concerns, the main tradeoff often comes down to different cost structures. Provisioned services often have higher upfront costs but can be cheaper in the long run for predictable, consistent workloads. Serverless, on the other hand, can be more cost-effective for unpredictable or inconsistent workloads.
Which type of service may require more management of servers or clusters: provisioned or serverless?
- Provisioned
- Serverless
Answer: Provisioned
Explanation: Provisioned services typically require active management of servers or clusters, while serverless aims to remove this operational burden.
True or False: Serverless services automatically scale according to workload.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: One of the key advantages of serverless services is that they automatically scale to match the workload, eliminating the need for manual provisioning.
True or False: Provisioned services generally offer more flexibility than serverless.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: Provisioned services often offer more control and flexibility since you are managing the servers and clusters directly.
If a company has a highly predictable workload with consistent demand, which type of service could be more cost-effective: provisioned or serverless?
- Provisioned
- Serverless
Answer: Provisioned
Explanation: Provisioned services can be more cost-effective in scenarios with predictable, consistent workloads as they have fixed costs regardless of usage.
In which scenario could serverless services lead to increased costs?
- A) Unpredictable workloads
- B) High-traffic periods
- C) Consistent, long-term workloads
- D) Light, short-term workloads
Answer: C) Consistent, long-term workloads
Explanation: While serverless services commonly save money for unpredictable workloads or light, short-term tasks, they can be costlier for consistent, long-term workloads due to their pay-as-you-go model.
True or False: Provisioned services scale automatically based on demand.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: Unlike serverless services, provisioned ones require manual scaling based on demand.
True or False: Serverless services can be slower to start up than provisioned services.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: Serverless services can involve a “cold start” delay, which doesn’t occur with provisioned ones that are always running.
Which type of service could be more prone to vendor lock-in: provisioned or serverless?
- Provisioned
- Serverless
Answer: Serverless
Explanation: Serverless services can potentially result in more vendor lock-in, as it is harder to move serverless functions between cloud providers than to move provisioned VMs.
True or False: Provisioned services typically offer lower latency than serverless services.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: Provisioned services are usually faster and offer lower latency than serverless ones due to the overhead associated with serverless abstraction layers.
Multiple choice: Which of the following tasks requires a provisioned service?
- A) Static web hosting
- B) Real-time file processing
- C) Data backup
- D) High throughput database workloads
Answer: D) High throughput database workloads
Explanation: High throughput database workloads typically require the level of control and resources associated with provisioned services.
True or False: Serverless services require no administration or server maintenance.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: One of the main benefits of serverless services is that they abstract away server administration and maintenance so that developers can focus on application logic.
True or False: Only serverless services benefit from pay-as-you-go pricing.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: Both provisioned and serverless services can leverage pay-as-you-go pricing, although the manner in which costs accrue can differ.
Multiple choice: Serverless is more suitable for which of the following scenarios?
- A) Large scale, predictable workloads
- B) Rapidly changing, unpredictable workloads
- C) Long-term, consistent workloads
- D) High throughput database workloads
Answer: B) Rapidly changing, unpredictable workloads
Explanation: Serverless services are ideal for rapidly changing, variable workloads because they don’t require upfront provisioning and scale automatically based on demand.
Interview Questions
What does the term “provisioned services” refer to in AWS?
Provisioned services in AWS refers to the traditional method of AWS resource allocation where you manually allocate resources based on your project’s needs.
What is meant by “serverless services” in AWS?
Serverless services in AWS refer to the compute execution model where AWS dynamically allocates machine resources. Billing is based on the actual amount of resources consumed by an application, not on pre-purchased units of capacity.
What is a trade-off when choosing serverless services over provisioned services?
One main trade-off is control over the environment. With serverless services, you lose control over the server environment since AWS takes care of it. On the other hand, provisioned services give you more control over the server environment.
How do cost considerations differ between provisioned services and serverless services in AWS?
With provisioned services, you pay for pre-purchased units of capacity, potentially leading to over-provisioning costs. On the contrary, with serverless services, you only pay for what you use, which can lead to cost savings if your application has variable or unpredictable traffic.
How does scalability differ between serverless and provisioned services?
Serverless services can automatically scale to match application demand, abstracting the need to monitor and scale resources. Meanwhile, with provisioned services, you need to manually monitor performance metrics and adjust resources accordingly.
Which AWS service is a good example of a serverless service?
AWS Lambda is a prime example of a serverless service.
What is a chief tradeoff between serverless and provisioned services in terms of performance?
Performance can be a concern with serverless services due to the “cold start” issue where the initial execution of a function may experience latency. Provisioned services do not typically experience this latency.
How does maintenance differ when using a provisioned service compared to a serverless service in AWS?
For serverless services, AWS handles all of the maintenance, including any underlying server infrastructure, leaving developers to only manage their application. Provisioned services require manual maintenance to keep them running efficiently.
Can you name an example of a provisioned service in AWS?
Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) is an example of a provisioned service in AWS.
How does architectural complexity differ between provisioned services and serverless services in AWS?
Serverless architecture can be more complex because components are broken down into separate functions that can run independently. Provisioned services, however, typically have a simpler architecture with fewer components.
How do serverless and provisioned services differ in terms of deployment speed?
Serverless services generally allow for quicker deployment and faster time-to-market compared to provisioned services due to not requiring server setup or management.
What is a potential pitfall of using serverless services over provisioned services in AWS?
A potential pitfall of serverless services is vendor lock-in. Applications designed for AWS serverless architecture may not translate seamlessly to other cloud providers’ services.
How do the two types of services differ in terms of reliability?
Serverless services are designed to be fault-tolerant and provide built-in availability and fault tolerance. With provisioned services, these attributes need to be manually set up and managed.
What are the differences in terms of security between the two types of services?
With provisioned services, you have control over the security of the entire stack. With serverless services, the provider is responsible for security of the underlying layers, and you are responsible only for application-level security.
How do serverless and provisioned services differ in terms of their pricing models?
For serverless services, you are billed based on actual usage. For provisioned services, you need to purchase fixed capacities in advance and you are billed whether you use them fully or not.
extutorials.com