Among the various strategies for moving workloads to the cloud, lift-and-shift (rehosting), lift-shift-migrate (replatforming), and lift-shift-migrate to HANA (rearchitecting) methods are common for SAP workloads, especially when preparing for the AZ-120 Planning and Administering Azure for SAP Workloads exam. Understanding these methods and choosing the right one for your project is critical to ensuring a successful migration.
Lift-and-Shift (Rehosting)
The lift-and-shift approach involves moving your entire SAP systems without modification to Azure cloud from your on-premises environment. It is like moving a house; all items being moved to a new location as they are. This method involves no change to the application code, functions, or data structure.
Why Choose Lift-and-Shift:
- Fastest migration method: Applications and data are transferred to the cloud in their existing state.
- Reduced complexity: No update or modification required.
- Risk and disruption mitigation: Fewer changes mean lower chances of operational disruptions.
Limitations of Lift-and-Shift:
- Missed cloud optimization: Lift-and-shift does not take full advantage of cloud-native capabilities.
- Continued maintenance burden: The on-premises systems that were difficult to maintain will probably be challenging to maintain in the cloud.
Lift-Shift-Migrate (Replatforming)
The lift-shift-migrate method, also known as replatforming, includes some modification to the system while moving it to the Azure cloud. These changes can be applied to the application layers, the database, or even the data. The main goal here is to leverage the capabilities of the cloud.
Why Choose Lift-Shift-Migrate:
- Performance improvements: The modifications allow for system performance enhancements.
- Cost-effective: Utilizing cloud-native capabilities often leads to better resource management and lower costs.
- Step towards modernization: Replatforming is often a stepping stone for further application modernization or redevelopment in the future.
Limitations of Lift-Shift-Migrate:
- Increased complexity: Modifications to the system could introduce unexpected complications.
- Additional time and resources: The process of making the modifications require extra time and resources.
Lift-Shift-Migrate to HANA (Rearchitecting)
The lift-shift-migrate to HANA method falls into the category of rearchitecting. In this approach, the entire system undergoes a significant transformation during the migration process. As SAP has been recommending its users move to S/4HANA, this method involves making such a significant shift.
Why Choose Lift-Shift-Migrate to HANA:
- Enhanced functionalities: SAP HANA offers advanced abilities like real-time analytics and improved application performance.
- Future-proofing: SAP is pushing its customer base to move towards S/4HANA, making this transition future-proof.
- Full utilization of the cloud: SAP HANA is designed to fully exploit Cloud-native capabilities.
Limitations of Lift-Shift-Migrate to HANA:
- High complexity: This method is the most complex and risky, as it involves a significant overhaul of the system.
- Considerable time and resources: Planning and executing a transition to HANA is time-consuming and resource-intensive.
As you prepare for AZ-120 Planning and Administering Azure for SAP Workloads exam, understanding these migration methods will help you design and implement successful migration strategies. Remember, the right method depends on the specific needs, resources, and goals of your project.
Practice Test
True/False: Lift-and-shift migration strategy provides opportunities to optimize your SAP systems.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: In Lift-and-shift, the applications are moved to the cloud without changes. However, once the system is stable in the cloud, there are opportunities to explore further optimization.
Single Select: What changes to applications are made during a lift-and-shift migration strategy?
- a) Complete redesign of the application
- b) Software architecture changes
- c) None
- d) Complete reprogramming of the application
Answer: c) None
Explanation: The lift-and-shift approach involves minimal change to the application; it is literally “lifted” from its current environment and “shifted” to a new one.
True/False: Lift-shift-migrate approach involves redesigning the applications.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: Lift-shift-migrate approach not just involves moving applications to the cloud but also involves necessary changes and redesigning in the applications.
Multiple Select: What are the advantages of lift-shift-migrate to HANA?
- a) Reduced downtime
- b) Ability to innovate
- c) Increase in performance
- d) Increasing the complexity of the workload
Answer: a) Reduced downtime, b) Ability to innovate, c) Increase in performance
Explanation: Lift-shift-migrate approach to HANA leverages the benefits of reduced downtime, ability to innovate, and an overall improvement in performance. Increasing the workload complexity is generally considered as a disadvantage.
Single Select: What is an advantage of the lift-and-shift approach?
- a) Reduction in complexity
- b) It requires less time and resource
- c) Both a) and b)
- d) None of the above
Answer: c) Both a) and b)
Explanation: The lift-and-shift approach is advantageous because it reduces complexity and reduces the amount of time and resources necessary for migration.
True/False: The lift-shift-migrate strategy does not require any re-architecture of applications.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: The lift-shift-migrate strategy involves necessary changes and redesigning in the application, it requires re-architecture of applications.
Single Select: Which migration strategy usually takes the longest amount of time to implement?
- a) Lift-and-shift
- b) Lift-shift-migrate
- c) Lift-shift-migrate to HANA
- d) All take the same amount of time
Answer: c) Lift-shift-migrate to HANA
Explanation: Due to the re-architecture and redesign, lift-shift-migrate to HANA tends to take the longest amount of time to implement.
Multiple Select: What are common reasons to choose the lift-shift-migrate approach?
- a) The need to reduce costs
- b) The need for rapid migration
- c) Software is outdated or incompatible
- d) Desire to maintain the current environment without changes
Answer: a) The need to reduce costs, c) Software is outdated or incompatible
Explanation: The lift-shift-migrate approach is usually chosen when there’s a need to reduce costs or when the software is outdated/ incompatible. This method is not suited for rapid migration or maintaining the current environment.
True/False: The lift-shift-migrate to HANA strategy includes both migration to the cloud and migration to SAP HANA database.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: The lift-shift-migrate to HANA strategy includes both moving applications to the cloud and switching to SAP HANA as the main database.
Single Select: Which strategy is ideal to maintain current environment settings without any changes?
- a) Lift-and-shift
- b) Lift-shift-migrate
- c) Lift-shift-migrate to HANA
- d) All of the above
Answer: a) Lift-and-shift
Explanation: Lift-and-shift is the right strategy if you wish to maintain your current environment settings without any changes since it involves minimal changes to the applications.
Interview Questions
What is the lift-and-shift migration strategy?
Lift-and-shift migration strategy involves moving applications and data from the organization’s on-premises data center to the cloud without making any modifications.
What is lift-shift-migrate strategy?
Lift-shift-migrate strategy entails moving applications and data from an on-premises environment to cloud first without any modification (lift-and-shift phase), and then gradually re-architecting or refactoring the applications to take full advantage of cloud features (migrate phase).
What does lift-shift-migrate to HANA strategy mean?
It refers to moving existing applications and data from on-premise or another cloud to the SAP HANA database on Azure, without changes initially, and then modifying to leverage the capabilities of the HANA database.
When would you choose the lift-and-shift strategy?
The lift-and-shift strategy is suitable when you need to move the application quickly, the application is already suitable for the cloud, or you plan to re-architect the application at a later date.
When is the lift-shift-migrate strategy most beneficial?
This strategy is mostly beneficial when you want to move quickly to the cloud first and then refactor your applications in phases to incrementally take advantage of the cloud-native features and functionalities.
When is lift-shift-migrate to HANA strategy preferable?
This strategy is preferable when you’re migrating SAP workloads to Azure and looking to take advantage of the performance and capabilities offered by the SAP HANA database on Azure.
Is it necessary to refactor the application during the lift-and-shift migration strategy?
No, the lift-and-shift migration strategy is about moving the existing application to the cloud without any changes.
Can you move to Azure using lift-and-shift without any downtime?
While Azure facilitates minimal downtime migrations, each migration is unique and the actual downtime depends on the specifics of the application and the migration chosen.
When using the lift-shift-migrate strategy, can the ‘migrate’ phase be skipped?
Technically, yes. However, skipping the ‘migrate’ phase means you would lose out on re-architecting the application to fully leverage cloud features, which could limit application performance and efficiency.
Can I migrate to any other database when using lift-shift-migrate to HANA strategy?
No, lift-shift-migrate to HANA strategy specifically refers to migrating to the SAP HANA database. For migrating to any other database, a different strategy would be required.
What are the key considerations while choosing a migration strategy among lift-and-shift, lift-shift-migrate, and lift-shift-migrate to HANA?
Key considerations include the nature of your applications, time constraints, budget, technical expertise, the desired future state of your applications, and whether or not you are moving SAP workloads.
Is the lift-and-shift strategy cheaper than lift-shift-migrate or lift-shift-migrate to HANA?
The cost of each strategy depends on the specifics of each project. Lift-and-shift might have lower upfront costs but could end up costing more in the long run due to missed opportunities to optimize for the cloud.
Is it possible to switch strategies halfway through the migration?
It’s technically possible but not recommended due to cost implications, time consumption, and likely complexity. A detailed migration plan should be defined at the outset.
When should I not use lift-and-shift migration strategy?
If your application needs significant changes to comply with cloud architecture, or if you need to leverage specific cloud features immediately, lift-and-shift might not be the best strategy.
When migrating SAP workloads, is it recommended to use lift-shift-migrate to HANA strategy?
Yes, it’s often recommended because this strategy allows you to leverage the performance and capabilities of the SAP HANA database on Azure after migration.
extutorials.com