The Certified Scrum Professional for Developers (CSP-D) exam underlines this skill-set as crucial for a certified practitioner. In this post, we are going to critique a legacy system using five criteria to gain a better understanding of the legacy systems that developers have to navigate through frequently.
1. Interoperability
Interoperability is the measure of how smoothly and effectively a system will work with other systems. It’s quite common for legacy systems to have interoperability issues due to their outdated nature. This can considerably increase complexity for developers trying to integrate new technologies, and the inability to work seamlessly with other systems could severely impact business operations. So how can we compare this criteria? A simple way to look into it would be to measure the amount of work required to integrate the legacy system with another, assessing the level of effort on a scale like this:
| Level of Effort | Interoperability |
| Low | High |
| Moderate | Moderate |
| High | Low |
2. Scalability
Scalability refers to the system’s ability to handle increased workloads. Legacy systems often lag behind when it comes to scalability due to their locked-down nature, limiting the expansion of business processes. A good test of scalability is trying to increase the volume of data or users and see how the system reacts. For instance, testing with the following scale:
| Increase in Load | System Performance |
| 25% | Good |
| 50% | Fair |
| 75% | Poor |
3. Security
Legacy systems usually lack sophisticated security mechanisms due to their age. It is this lack of up-to-date security features that make these systems highly susceptible to security breaches and cyber-attacks. Various assessments, like vulnerability testing and penetration testing, can be conducted to test the security of the system.
4. Maintenance and Support
The cost and resources required for maintaining a legacy system are often high. This is due to the possible need for specialized resources who understand the outdated technology and could be substantially more expensive than normal resources. Additionally, if the vendor no longer supports the outdated software, obtaining necessary patches and updates can be a challenge.
5. Performance
Performance is a key attribute of any system, and with legacy systems, it is often an issue. The slower processing times can result in wasted time and lost productivity. Performance can be evaluated by measuring system response time, throughput, and capacity under different workload conditions.
Remember, critiquing a legacy system is not always about unearthing deficiencies. It’s also a chance to identify elements that, despite their age, still work effectively and efficiently. Correct insights here can potentially save tremendous amounts of time and resources that can be better spent on innovation elsewhere.
In conclusion, depending on the outcomes of these tests and assessments, Certified Scrum Professionals can decide whether it’s best to proceed with the legacy systems, modernize, or decommission them. It is important to keep in mind that each legacy system has its unique set of challenges and should be dealt with individually.
Practice Test
True or False: The cost of maintaining a legacy system is an important criterion when critiquing it.
- True
- False
Answer: True.
Explanation: The cost of maintaining a legacy system is one of the most significant expenses. If it is too high, it might be more economical to replace the whole system.
What is not a valid criterion to critique a legacy system?
- A. The age of the system
- B. The color of the user interface
- C. The language it was programmed in
- D. The compatibility with new technologies
Answer: B. The color of the user interface.
Explanation: The color of the user interface is a subjective preference and does not provide any substantial information about the legacy system’s functionality or inefficiencies.
True or False: The lack of portability of a legacy system can be seen as a negative aspect when critiquing it.
- True
- False
Answer: True.
Explanation: Portability is important as it allows a system to be used in various contexts and to be moved from one environment to another with ease. This increases the longevity and adaptability of the system.
When critiquing a legacy system, it’s not important to consider:
- A. The system’s performance metrics
- B. Latest celebrity gossip
- C. The system’s integration capabilities
- D. Documentation and support available for the system
Answer: B. Latest celebrity gossip.
Explanation: Critiquing a legacy system should focus on its technical details, performance, integration capabilities, cost, and documentation, not unrelated aspects like celebrity gossip.
True or False: The reliability of a legacy system can be a valid criterion for critique.
- True
- False
Answer: True.
Explanation: The reliability of a system is crucial as it determines the system’s ability to perform its required functions without failure or shutdown.
Non-functional requirements are not crucial in critiquing a legacy system. True or False?
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: Non-functional requirements, such as performance and security, are crucial in critiquing a legacy system as they directly impact user satisfaction and system efficiency.
Which among these is not a relevant criterion when critiquing a legacy system?
- A. The coding style used in its development
- B. The distance of the development team’s location
- C. The level of skill required to maintain the system
- D. The system’s ability to scale with business growth
Answer: B. The distance of the development team’s location
Explanation: While the location can impact communication and project management, it is not a direct attribute of the system itself.
True or False: When critiquing a legacy system, reviewing the technical limitations of hardware and software is not important.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: Understanding the technical limitations is essential to accurately assess the system’s ability to meet current and future requirements.
Critiquing a legacy system does not involve:
- A. Examining its functionality
- B. Investigating the system’s security
- C. Evaluating the system’s influence on company politics
- D. Assessing system performance
Answer: C. Evaluating the system’s influence on company politics.
Explanation: Company politics are not a technical aspect of a system. The critique should be focused on system’s functionality, security, performance etc.
True or False: A legacy system’s ability to integrate with new technologies is not a criterion for critique.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: Integration with new technologies is a crucial criterion when critiquing a legacy system. It speaks to the system’s flexibility and adaptability to change.
Interview Questions
What five criteria can be used to critique a legacy system?
Five criteria that can be used to critique a legacy system are: scalability, security, maintainability, technology compatibility, and documentation quality.
Why is scalability a crucial criterion for evaluating a legacy system?
Scalability is important as it determines the ability of the system to handle growth or increased demand. If a legacy system cannot scale to meet increased user numbers or data volume, it may negatively affect the performance and potentially the business.
How is security used in critiquing a legacy system?
Security is a critical aspect to examine in a legacy system. Critiquing a legacy system should include checking if it meets current data protection standards, if it can protect against modern threats, and if it has regular security updates and patches.
Why is maintainability important in critiquing a legacy system?
Maintainability is crucial because it is directly linked to the cost and effort required to manage and upgrade the system. If the codebase is unreadable or overly complicated, it can increase the time and resources needed to maintain the system.
What does compatibility with modern technology mean when critiquing a legacy system?
Evaluating for technology compatibility means checking if the legacy system can effectively integrate with modern technologies and tools. If not, it might limit the system’s ability to leverage new tech trends or interfaces.
Why is assessing documentation quality important in criticizing a legacy system?
A well-documented system simplifies troubleshooting, enhances usability, and makes it easier for new team members to understand the code. Poor documentation can make problem-solving harder and delay delivery times.
How does operational efficiency factor in when critiquing a legacy system?
Operational efficiency examines whether the legacy system still performs effectively and reliably. A system that frequently crashes or slows down significantly impacts productivity and customer satisfaction.
In what way does the technical debt impact the critique of a legacy system?
Technical debt, defined as the future cost of rework due to shortcuts or improper solutions, can make the system more difficult and expensive to maintain and upgrade. High technical debt could be a sign that a more flexible, modern system may be a better investment.
Why is customer satisfaction an essential criterion for critiquing a legacy system?
A legacy system directly impacts customer or end-user satisfaction. If it is slow, unreliable or has a poor user interface, customer satisfaction will be low, potentially affecting the company’s reputation and revenue.
How can the future roadmap or plans for the system affect the critique of a legacy system?
If the future plans require technology or capabilities that the legacy system cannot support or would be expensive to implement, it may indicate the need for a system upgrade or replacement. A critique should therefore include an assessment of the system’s alignment with future needs.
What does data integrity mean when evaluating a legacy system?
Data integrity examines whether the legacy system preserves the accuracy and consistency of data over its lifecycle. While critiquing, it is essential to assess data integrity since data corruption can lead to inaccurate data-driven decisions.
How does adherence to coding standards and practices factor into critiquing a legacy system?
Adherence to coding standards and practices helps ensure the system’s maintainability, reliability, and scalability. Therefore, when critiquing a legacy system, it’s important to evaluate how well it follows coding standards and principles, such as SOLID, DRY, and KISS.
How important is the speed of the legacy system when it comes to critiquing it?
The speed of the legacy system is very important because it influences user experience. The slower the system, the lower the user satisfaction.
Why is vendor support critical when evaluating a legacy system?
Vendor support is crucial as it provides software updates, security patches, and assistance when technical challenges arise. If vendor support is no longer available for a legacy system, it may indicate a need for system replacement.
How does system integration affect the critique of a legacy system?
A good system needs to effectively integrate with other systems and technologies. Poor integration capabilities can lead to siloed information, data inconsistencies, and inefficient operations.
extutorials.com