This involves understanding various metrics, using data visualization tools, and applying suitable statistical methods.
I. Understanding the Theory
The cornerstone of the CSP-PO role is to maximize product value, and doing so necessitates continually evaluating the product’s progress. Most CSP-POs do this on a sprint-by-sprint basis, gauging the success of each product increment by assessing it against predetermined objectives or hypothesis. This essential part of the empirical process is what makes Scrum an empirical process control framework.
II. Defining the Measurements
Developing a set of metrics is the starting point for evaluating the effects of an experiment. Picking the right metric is pivotal, as it’s what will guide your implementation strategy. Some common ones include:
- Product increment’s quality: This gauges the increment’s usability and the user satisfaction.
- Velocity: This assesses the amount of work the Scrum team completes during a sprint.
- Sprint goal success: This measures how often the sprint goal is achieved.
- Stakeholder satisfaction: This quantifies whether or not stakeholders are happy with the product development progress.
Let’s use the metric ‘Sprint goal success’ as an example. Suppose we are assessing an experiment aimed at increasing the team’s success rate in achieving the sprint goal.
III. Performing the Experiment
The ‘Inspect and Adapt’ philosophy that underpins Scrum promotes the idea of implementing changes and measuring their outcomes, intending to improve. Therefore, performing an experiment could be as simple as trying a different approach and gauging its success.
In our example, the CSP-PO might suggest increasing the time spent on backlog refinement, intending to improve the clarity of the Product Backlog items and thus achieve a higher sprint goal success rate.
IV. Evaluating the results
The crux of any experiment is evaluating the results. To evaluate the experiment’s impact, the CSP-PO should measure the defined metric before and after the experiment, and contrast the two results. A higher success rate would indicate that the change was useful, leading to better agility.
For instance, if the success rate was 60% before the experiment and increased to 80% after, it indicates a 20% improvement.
V. Determining the Impact
To ascertain the impact of the experiment, the CSP-PO needs to infer whether the changes implemented were the cause of the observed results. This is where the application of statistical methodologies could be useful.
One way to achieve this would be by employing the ‘Control chart’ method where process changes over time are charted. If the average observed after the change is statistically different from the one before, it is a good indicator that the experiment had an impact.
VI. Iterating on the Experiment
Once the data is evaluated, the product increment is either accepted or declined. If accepted, the increment becomes a part of the product. If declined, the Scrum Team, along with the Product Owner, will need to understand why and what adjustments are needed.
Being able to assess the results and impacts of an experiment is a critical skill that every CSP-PO should have. It forms the core of their role, driving product development, innovation, and overall business success. By focusing on the right metrics, applying the right statistical tools, and continuously iterating in the light of what was learned, a CSP-PO can truly create ground-breaking products.
Practice Test
True or False: In evaluating the results of an experiment, a Certified Scrum Professional-Product Owner (CSP-PO) must disregard any unexpected findings.
- Answer: False.
Explanation: Unexpected findings may provide valuable insights and learning opportunities, leading to adjustments that can improve future experiments.
As a CSP-PO, when should you evaluate your experiment?
- a) Before the experiment starts
- b) After the experiment ends
- c) Halfway through the experiment
- d) All of the above
Answer: b) After the experiment ends.
Explanation: The full evaluation of an experiment is only constructive once the whole experiment has been completed and all the results are available.
True or False: The main objective of evaluating the impact of an experiment is to simply confirm your initial hypothesis.
- Answer: False.
Explanation: The main goal is to gain insights, learn and continually improve. Therefore, whether the results confirm or contradict the initial hypothesis, it is equally important to understand why.
Which one of these is not part of evaluating results and impacts of experiments?
- a) Interpreting the results
- b) Documenting the findings
- c) Developing the code
- d) Reflecting on what was learned
Answer: c) Developing the code.
Explanation: Developing the code is part of conducting the experiment, not the evaluation process.
As a CSP-PO, it is necessary to review every single data point when evaluating the results of an experiment.
- Answer: True.
Explanation: Every data point might contain valuable insights. As such, the CSP-PO must ensure all are checked.
In the Scrum framework, who is responsible for evaluating the results and impact of an experiment?
- a) Scrum Master
- b) Product Owner
- c) Business Stakeholder
- d) All members of the Scrum team
Answer: d) All members of the Scrum team.
Explanation: While each role has its specific responsibilities, it is the collective effort of the Scrum team to evaluate the result and impact of an experiments.
True or False: Assessing the impact of an experiment involves considering both the immediate effects and potential long-term implications of the results.
- Answer: True.
Explanation: An evaluation should consider both immediate impacts and potential farther-reaching effects to obtain a complete understanding of the results.
Documentation is unnecessary in the evaluation process of an experiment in Scrum.
- Answer: False.
Explanation: Documentation is necessary to keep track of environments, configurations, results and learnings for future reference.
True or False: In the Scrum framework, the results of an experiment are discussed in the Sprint Review meeting.
- Answer: True.
Explanation: The Sprint Review meeting is the appropriate platform to discuss the results of any experiments conducted during the sprint.
As a Certified Scrum Professional – Product Owner, when analyzing multiple experiments, it is acceptable to combine the results for evaluation.
- Answer: True.
Explanation: It is acceptable to combine results only if the experiments are similar or if they are intended to evaluate the same hypothesis, product feature or process.
Interview Questions
What does evaluating the results of an experiment involve in the Scrum framework?
It involves analyzing the achieved outcomes in contrast to the expected outcomes, and then understanding the reasons for any discrepancies.
How does one measure the impact of an experiment in Scrums?
The impact of an experiment can be measured through various factors like changes in team efficiency, product quality, customer satisfaction, and increased market share.
What role does a Product Owner play in evaluating experiment results?
A Product Owner plays a vital role in evaluating experiment results. They analyze the results, learn from the outcomes, and adapt the product backlog accordingly.
What can be the impact on the Scrum Team if the experiment results are not evaluated properly?
If experiment results are not evaluated properly, it could lead to decision-making based on incorrect information, resulting in lowered productivity, wastage of resources, and decreased quality of the product.
How frequent should the evaluation of an experiment’s results be in the Scrum Framework?
Evaluation of an experiment’s results should be a continuous process. However, it becomes particularly important at the end of each sprint during the review meeting.
How can a Product Owner evaluate the results of an experiment with new product features?
They can utilize user feedback, key performance indicators, usage statistics or A/B testing results to assess how the new features are performing and adapt accordingly.
What tools can a Product Owner use to evaluate the results of an experiment?
Tools such as data analytics software, A/B testing tools, user feedback system, etc. can be used for evaluation.
Why is it crucial to evaluate the results and impact of an experiment as a Certified Scrum Professional Product Owner?
This evaluation helps understand how the experiment has influenced the product, team performance, and customer satisfaction, helping the Product Owner update the product backlog, prioritize tasks and guide the scrum team accordingly.
How does an evaluation of experimental results impact future sprint planning?
Based on the evaluation, the Product Owner may re-prioritize user stories and tasks in the backlog to align better with the business goals, impacting future sprint planning.
What step should a Product Owner take post experiment result evaluation if outcomes are not as expected?
If the outcomes are not as expected, a Product Owner should use this information for backlog refinement, perhaps adjusting the upcoming user stories, or pivoting the product strategy as necessary.
How do unexpected results from an experiment impact a scrum team?
Unexpected results can serve as an opportunity for the Scrum Team to adapt and learn. They offer insights into potential problems and provide a chance to improve the product and the process.
extutorials.com