Azure Cosmos DB provides developers with five consistency models:
- Strong
- Bounded staleness
- Session
- Consistent prefix
- Eventual
Strong consistency guarantees linearizability, where read operations always return the most recent written value. Eventual consistency, on the other end of the spectrum, provides the lowest latency and highest availability but without any immediate consistency between replicas. The rest of the models lie in between – offering different trade-offs in regard to read and write latency, availability, and consistency.
Generally, a lower consistency level (like eventual consistency) can result in lower costs due to a reduced number of required RUs for operations. This is because a higher consistency often requires additional read and replication operations to ensure the same data state across all replicas.
Impact on Availability
As the consistency level increases from eventual to strong, the availability of the system may decrease. This is because strong consistency requires more coordination across replicas, which can introduce potential points of failure and downtime. For example, under strong consistency, write operations have to be propagated and acknowledged by all replicas before the operation is considered complete, thus, increasing latency and reducing the overall availability in case of network partitioning or other failures.
Impact on RU Cost
The consistency level directly affects RU cost – the higher the consistency level, the more expensive the operation is in terms of RUs. Request Units (RUs) represent the cost of database operations. For example, a read operation under the strong consistency model will cost more RUs compared to the same operation under eventual consistency.
Balancing Availability and RU Cost
When designing your application, it’s important to balance both availability and RU cost based on your specific application requirements. For example, if your application highly values availability and can tolerate inconsistency to some degree, you may choose to use the eventual or consistent prefix consistency models which provide high availability and low RU cost.
However, if your application requires strong consistency for critical operations (i.e., financial transactions), you may choose to use the more RU-costly strong consistency model.
In conclusion, the choice of consistency model in Azure Cosmos DB greatly impacts both the availability and the associated RU cost. Understanding these impacts allows developers to make informed decisions in designing their applications, striking a balance between consistency, availability, and cost-effectiveness.
Understanding the principles and impacts discussed is crucial in passing exam like “DP-420 Designing and Implementing Native Applications Using Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB”. It requires a deep dive into consistency models, their implications on availability and the associated RU cost.
In further articles, we will take a closer look at each of the five consistency models Azure Cosmos DB provides, their practical examples, and use-cases that will add more clarity around this topic and would be beneficial in preparing for the exam.
Practice Test
True or False: Changes in consistency models do not affect the latency of the application.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: The consistency model chosen can greatly impact the latency of the application as strong consistency may require additional synchronization steps, increasing latency.
Single Select: Which of the following consistency models offers the highest availability in Azure Cosmos DB?
- a) Eventual consistency
- b) Strong consistency
- c) Bounded staleness
- d) Session consistency
Answer: a) Eventual consistency
Explanation: Eventual consistency offers the highest availability as it allows the system to continue functioning even if some replicas are unreachable or lagging.
True or False: Strong consistency improves write availability in Azure Cosmos DB.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: Strong consistency can actually decrease write availability as it ensures that all replicas need to acknowledge the write operation, which can lead to unavailability in case of a network partition or a single replica failure.
Multiple Select: Which of the following can increase based on the choice of consistency model?
- a) Latency
- b) Request Unit (RU) cost
- c) Availability
- d) Bandwidth usage
Answer: a) Latency, b) Request Unit (RU) cost, and d) Bandwidth usage.
Explanation: The consistency model chosen can impact all of these. Stronger consistency models may increase latency due to synchronization, increase RU cost due to extra operations, and also increase bandwidth usage due to additional data transfers for maintaining consistency.
True or False: Session consistency provides a decent compromise between consistency, availability, and performance.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: Session consistency provides strong consistency within a single session (meaning single user or device) and eventual consistency across different sessions, providing a good balance.
Single Select: How do consistency model choices impact RU cost in Azure Cosmos DB?
- a) Stronger consistency models always lead to higher RU costs.
- b) Weaker consistency models always lead to lower RU costs.
- c) The impact on RU cost is unpredictable and varies on a case-by-case basis.
- d) Consistency models do not impact RU costs.
Answer: c) The impact on RU cost is unpredictable and varies on a case-by-case basis.
Explanation: The impact on the RU cost is dependent on various factors like read/write patterns, data size, and more, and isn’t strictly tied to the choice of consistency model.
True or False: In Azure Cosmos DB, changing the consistency model does not impact the availability of read operations.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: Changing the consistency model can impact the availability of read operations. For example, stronger consistency could reduce read availability in case of network partitioning.
Single Select: Which consistency model is most likely to drive up RU cost in Azure Cosmos DB?
- a) Eventual consistency
- b) Strong consistency
- c) Session consistency
- d) Bounded staleness
Answer: b) Strong consistency
Explanation: Strong consistency often increases RU cost as it requires additional synchronization steps for write operations and can cause higher latency.
True or False: The choice of consistency model can impact the throughput of the Azure Cosmos DB application.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: Stricter consistency models may lead to a decrease in throughput due to additional synchronization steps required for maintaining consistency.
Multiple Select: In Azure Cosmos DB, which of the following consistency models prioritize availability over consistency?
- a) Eventual consistency
- b) Strong consistency
- c) Bounded staleness
- d) Session consistency
Answer: a) Eventual consistency.
Explanation: Eventual consistency prioritizes availability over consistency by allowing updates to propagate across replicas over time, which means that reads may return stale data in the meanwhile.
Interview Questions
What is a consistency model in the context of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?
The consistency model determines how updates propagate through replicas in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB. Azure Cosmos DB offers five consistency models – Strong, Bounded staleness, Session, Consistent prefix, and Eventual.
How does the choice of consistency model impact availability in Azure Cosmos DB?
The choice of consistency model in Azure Cosmos DB directly influences availability. Strong and bounded staleness consistency ensure strict consistency and accuracy but may impact availability during network partition, while session, consistent prefix, and eventual consistency prioritize availability and latency over absolute accuracy in case of failure or split-brain.
What is the Request Unit (RU) cost and how can different consistency models affect it?
Request Units (RUs) are the measure of throughput or processing capacity in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB. The more strict the consistency model, the higher the RU cost. This is because stronger consistency levels require more computational resources and replicas coordination leading to increased RU consumption.
What are the trade-offs when choosing a strong consistency model in Azure Cosmos DB?
While a strong consistency model ensures absolute accuracy of read operations, it might lead to higher latency and decreased availability in case of network partitions or failures. Additionally, this consistency model might result in a higher RU cost due to increased resource usage for consistency maintenance.
What are the benefits of the eventual consistency model in Azure Cosmos DB?
The eventual consistency model provides lower latency, higher availability, and lower RU costs as it needs fewer resources and requires less coordination between replicas. However, it allows temporary inconsistencies between replicas which may not be appropriate for all use-cases.
Why would someone choose the Session consistency model in Azure Cosmos DB?
Session consistency is a compromise between strong consistency and eventual consistency. It guarantees consistency within a single session, ensuring that users always receive the data they have written. Though it may increase the RU cost compared with eventual consistency, it reduces the cost compared to strong consistency.
How does the Bounded staleness consistency model balance availability and consistency in Azure Cosmos DB?
Bounded staleness consistency ensures a specified lag between reads and writes, limiting the inconsistency window. This model guarantees a certain degree of accuracy, while also maintaining better availability and lower RU costs than strong consistency.
What is the Consistent prefix consistency model in Azure Cosmos DB?
The Consistent prefix consistency model guarantees that reads never see out-of-order writes. This means that if writes were performed in the order A, B, C, then a client will never see the sequence like A, C, B. This model may have higher RU costs in comparison to eventual consistency but provides a compromise between consistency and performance.
Does changing the consistency model retrospectively impact the availability or performance of Azure Cosmos DB?
Yes, changing the consistency model can impact both the availability and performance of Azure Cosmos DB. Stronger consistency may increase latency and decrease availability during network partitions while reducing the consistency level can result in data inconsistency across replicas.
Can the consistency level be configured separately for reads and writes in Azure Cosmos DB?
No, in Azure Cosmos DB the chosen consistency level applies to both read and write operations. Changing the consistency level will affect all operations against the database.
extutorials.com