Assessing and documenting risk consequences or impact is a crucial part of the PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) exam. Understanding risk is fundamental to professional project management, and the ability to correctly assess and document risk is instrumental in obtaining PMI-RMP certification.
Defining Risk Assessment
Risk assessment involves identification of risk, evaluating its severity, and determining potential threats to the project. It helps in formulating risk response measures and deciding whether the risk is acceptable or whether it requires mitigation strategies. A critical aspect of risk assessment is documenting the potential consequences of identified risks.
Documentation serves several important functions. It helps to communicate the nature and size of risks to stakeholders, informs decision-making, and ensures that information about risks is captured for future reference.
Steps in Assessing and Documenting Risk Consequences
- Risk Identification: The first step in risk assessment is identifying potential risk factors. This is usually achieved through brainstorming, using past experiences, and employing risk identification tools.
- Risk Analysis: After identifying potential risks, analyze them to understand their potential impact on the project. Consider factors such as evaluation of the risk’s probability, its potential impact, and its overall risk score (the product of the risk’s probability and impact).
- Risk Prioritization: After rating the risks based on their probability and impact, prioritize them. This is typically achieved by sorting risks based on their overall risk score.
- Risk Response Planning: Once the risks have been prioritized, formulate response plans for each risk. The response could be to accept, mitigate, transfer, or avoid the risk.
- Document the Risks: After the assessment and response planning, document each risk, its potential impact, its overall score, and its response plan.
Risk Documentation Example
| Risk ID | Description | Probability | Impact | Risk Score | Response Plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R101 | Budget Overrun | 0.70 | High | 14 | Mitigation through cost control |
| R102 | Employee Turnover | 0.50 | Medium | 7 | Transfer risk through subcontracting |
| R103 | Equipment Failure | 0.30 | High | 6 | Mitigation through regular maintenance |
The table above provides a clear and concise documentation of risks, including their ID, description, probability, impact, overall score, and response plan.
Documenting Risk Consequences and/or Impact
Documenting the impact or consequences of risks provides a clear picture of what might happen if the risk event occurs. This documentation enables stakeholders to understand the importance of managing each risk appropriately. For instance, if there is a high probability of budget overruns, a detailed documentation of these potential overruns can help convince stakeholders to set contingencies or adjust the budget allocations.
Impact documentation should include the full range of potential effects on the project, including cost, time frame changes, quality impacts, and scope variations. For instance, a risk that leads to a delay in project completion could impact costs (due to extra time spent on the project), scope (due to the eventual need to modify the project), and quality (through the rushing of tasks to meet deadlines).
In conclusion, understanding how to assess and document risk consequences and/or impact effectively forms a significant part of the PMI-RMP exam. Mastery of these concepts improves your abilities in identifying, analyzing, and managing risks in any project environment.
Practice Test
True or False: Documenting risk consequences is not a necessary part of risk management.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: Documenting risk consequences is a vital part of risk management as it provides clarity on the potential impacts, which aids in the preparation of mitigation strategies.
The impact of risks can only be negative.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: Risks can have either positive impacts (opportunities) or negative impacts (threats).
Risks with low probability and low impact should be ignored.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: No risks should be ignored; all should be documented and assessed for potential future changes in their impact or likelihood.
Which of the following is not a component of assessing risk impact?
- A. Identifying risk
- B. Determining the likelihood of occurrence
- C. Documenting the risk
- D. None of the above
Answer: D. None of the above.
Explanation: All the listed options are essential components of assessing risk impact in risk management.
The process of evaluating the severity of the potential effects of risks is known as:
- A. Risk assessment
- B. Risk identification
- C. Risk impact assessment
- D. All the above
Answer: C. Risk impact assessment.
Explanation: Although all are stages in risk management, risk impact assessment specifically deals with the evaluation of the severity of potential effects.
Which one of the following is least likely to aid in assessing risk consequences?
- A. Impact scales
- B. Probability and impact matrix
- C. Risk urgency assessment
- D. Post-project review report
Answer: D. Post-project review report.
Explanation: While a post-project review report can contain valuable insights, its primary function isn’t specifically aimed at risk consequences assessment.
True or False: The process of assessing the impact of a risk can be subjective.
- True
- False
Answer: True.
Explanation: The process can be subjective as it often relies on individual or team judgments and past experiences.
Risk consequences documentation does not include:
- A. The possibles consequences
- B. The probability of occurrence
- C. Risk response strategy
- D. The color of the risk
Answer: D. The color of the risk.
Explanation: The color of the risk does not carry any relevant information for risk management purposes.
Which of the following risks are typically most prioritized?
- A. Low likelihood, high impact
- B. High likelihood, high impact
- C. High likelihood, low impact
- D. Low likelihood, low impact
Answer: B. High likelihood, high impact.
Explanation: In most risk management situations, the risks that are both most likely to happen and carry the highest impact are prioritized.
True or False: Risk consequences and impacts should be documented only once at the start of the project.
- True
- False
Answer: False.
Explanation: The process is ongoing and should be updated as new information comes to light or conditions change.
Whose responsibility is it to document risk consequences and impacts?
- A. Project manager only
- B. Risk manager only
- C. Project team only
- D. All the above
Answer: D. All the above.
Explanation: While the project and risk managers hold primary responsibility, the entire project team should be involved in the risk management process.
The documentation of risk consequences contributes to:
- A. Improving project outcomes
- B. Streamlining project budgets
- C. Strengthening communication with stakeholders
- D. All the above
Answer: D. All the above.
Explanation: By understanding potential impacts, proactive steps can be taken to achieve project outcomes, manage budgets, and communicate effectively with stakeholders.
Interview Questions
What are the two types of risk consequences?
The two types of risk consequences are negative consequences (threats or risks) and positive consequences (opportunities).
What does the Initial Risk Level represent in risk documentation?
The Initial Risk Level in risk documentation represents the level of risk before any risk response actions are taken or any controlling measures are put in place.
What is Quantitative Risk Analysis in PMI Risk Management?
Quantitative Risk Analysis is a method that evaluates and numerically analyzes the effect of identified risks on overall project objectives. This analysis helps in prioritizing risks based on their potential impact on project objectives.
What is the role of a Risk Heat Map in the documentation of risk consequences?
A Risk Heat Map is a visual tool used to present the result of a risk assessment process. It provides project managers with a clear view of the risks’ probabilities and impacts, helping them prioritize and strategize risk responses effectively.
How is risk appetite linked to risk impact assessment?
Risk appetite defines the level of risk an organization is willing to accept. An organization with a high risk appetite may tolerate higher risk impacts compared to an organization with a low risk appetite.
In risk consequence documentation, what does a risk register contain?
A risk register holds all the information about identified risks in a project, including their characteristics, their impacts, their probability, the response strategy and the person responsible for managing each risk.
What is a Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) and how is it relevant in documenting risk consequences?
A Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) is a hierarchical representation of risks according to their categories. It aids in identifying, documenting, and analyzing risks effectively, helping project teams anticipate potential risks and their consequences.
What do you understand by “Risk Tolerance” in PMI-RMP?
Risk tolerance is the degree to which an individual or an organization can withstand potential loss from a risk. It helps in defining the parameters or boundaries within which risks can be accepted or rejected.
What is the concept of “Risk Urgency Assessment” in PMI-RMP?
Risk Urgency Assessment is a process where risks are prioritized based on their urgency. It considers factors like time, risk probability, impact, and other considerations to determine their treatment priority.
What are the essential elements required to document risk consequences?
The essential elements required to document risk consequences include risk identification, risk description, risk owner, probability of occurrence, potential impact, risk response strategy, and risk status.
How does a sensitivity analysis help in assessing the impact and consequences of risks?
A sensitivity analysis helps in assessing the effects of varying inputs on the outcomes of a particular risk. It is used to identify which risks have the most potential impact on the project, helping project managers to prioritize their risk responses.
How does Risk Severity Matrix help in assessing and documenting risks?
A Risk Severity Matrix is a tool used for ranking and prioritizing risks. It combines the level of impact of the risk event and the likelihood of occurrence in a matrix format, helping to visualize and understand the risk better.
What do you understand by ‘Risk Threshold’ in risk management?
The ‘Risk Threshold’ is the level at which a risk becomes unacceptable. If a risk is expected to have an impact above this threshold, actions must be taken to mitigate, transfer, or avoid it.
How do ‘probability’ and ‘impact’ interact in the assessment of risk consequences?
The interaction between ‘probability’ and ‘impact’ forms the risk exposure or risk severity. A high-impact, high-probability event would be deemed a high risk while a low-impact, low-probability event would be a low risk.
What is a Monte Carlo Simulation in PMI-RMP and how is it used in assessing risk consequences?
Monte Carlo Simulation is a computerized mathematical technique that allows people to account for risk in quantitative analysis and decision making. It provides a range of possible outcomes and the probabilities they will occur, helping in assessing risk consequences and impacts.
extutorials.com