Dispute resolution is an essential aspect of project management in construction, as it helps manage conflicts that can arise between various stakeholders involved in a project. Various dispute resolution techniques can be applied, many of which are relevant to those sitting the PMI Construction Professional (PMI-CP) exam. The purpose of this post is to provide insight into these techniques and illustrate how they can be practically applied in a construction project.
Negotiation
Negotiation is often the first step in dispute resolution. Here, the conflicting parties meet and discuss their issues, trying to find a mutually agreeable solution. Negotiation is direct, quick, and cost-effective, but it requires the willingness of both parties to reach a compromise.
For instance, if a construction company and a subcontractor have a disagreement over the quality of work, they can negotiate the completion of repairs or the reduction in cost.
Mediation
If negotiation doesn’t lead to a resolution, mediation is a viable next step. In this situation, a neutral third party, the mediator, helps the conflicting sides reach a mutually agreeable resolution. However, the mediator doesn’t enforce any solution but seeks to facilitate communication and understanding between the parties.
To illustrate, if a conflict escalates between the project manager and the supplier over delayed deliveries, a mediator can help both sides understand each other’s challenges and limitations, potentially leading them to a compromise.
Adjudication
Adjudication is a more formal method where a neutral third party, the adjudicator, reviews the dispute and provides a decision that is binding unless or until it is overturned in arbitration, litigation, or settlement.
Suppose the subcontractor claims additional payment due to variations in work but the contractor refuses, stating these changes were within the agreed scope of work. In such a case, an adjudicator would review the contract and make a decision on the correct interpretation of the scope of work.
Arbitration
Arbitration is a more legalistic method, where an arbitrator reviews evidence, hears arguments, and makes a binding decision. Arbitration can be expensive, but it may be necessary when other dispute resolution methods fail.
For example, if a contractor and a client cannot resolve a dispute over final payment through negotiation, mediation, or adjudication, they may agree to submit the dispute to arbitral proceedings.
Here is a brief comparison of these techniques:
| Technique | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Negotiation | Direct, Quick, Cost-effective | Requires willingness from both parties |
| Mediation | Facilitates understanding | Does not impose a solution |
| Adjudication | Provides a quick, Binding decision | Decision can be contested |
| Arbitration | Provides a final, Binding decision | Legalistic, Can be expensive |
Despite the method used, it’s essential to remember the importance of good communication and professional conduct in resolving disputes. By applying these techniques effectively, PMI-CPs can manage disputes appropriately, ensuring smoother project execution and maintaining positive relationships with all stakeholders.
Practice Test
True or False: Mediation is one of the methods used for dispute resolution in the construction industry.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: Mediation involves a neutral third party who helps the disputing parties come to an agreement on their own.
Which of the following is NOT a dispute resolution technique used in the construction industry?
- a) Negotiation
- b) Arbitration
- c) Mediation
- d) Destruction
Answer: d) Destruction
Explanation: Destruction is not a dispute resolution technique. The other three are widely acknowledged and applied methods for resolving disputes.
True or False: In mediation, the mediator makes a decision for the parties involved.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: A mediator only facilitates communication and encourages the parties to come to their own agreement; they do not make decisions for the parties.
When should dispute resolution techniques be used in a project?
- a) Never
- b) Only when a dispute arises
- c) Only at the beginning of a project
- d) Throughout the project lifecycle
Answer: d) Throughout the project lifecycle
Explanation: Dispute resolution methods and techniques should be embedded into the project plan and be used throughout the project life cycle, not just when disagreements arise.
Which of the following dispute resolution techniques involves a legally binding decision made by a third party?
- a) Negotiation
- b) Mediation
- c) Arbitration
- d) Litigation
Answer: c) Arbitration
Explanation: Arbitration results in a legal decision made by a neutral third party (the arbitrator). This decision is legally binding unless both parties agreed otherwise before the process.
True or False: One technique of dispute resolution in construction is always better than the others in every situation.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: The most effective dispute resolution technique really depends on the nature and specifics of the dispute. Different circumstances may demand different approaches.
Which of the following is often the first method attempted to resolve a dispute?
- a) Negotiation
- b) Mediation
- c) Arbitration
- d) Litigation
Answer: a) Negotiation
Explanation: In most cases, parties first try to negotiate among themselves to try and solve their disagreement before escalating to other methods.
True or False: Nine of Ten disputes are typically settled through litigation in the construction industry.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: In fact, the opposite is true. Approximately nine out of ten disputes in the construction industry are settled by negotiation before ever reaching litigation.
Arbitration is ____
- a) Non-binding
- b) Binding
- c) Neither
- d) Depends on the situation
Answer: b) Binding
Explanation: Arbitration is a binding dispute resolution technique when the arbitrator makes a decision which has to be accepted by both parties.
True or False: Using different dispute resolution techniques can help to maintain the relationship between the parties involved.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: When applied properly, dispute resolution techniques like negotiation and mediation can help preserve the business relationship between disputing parties by providing solutions that satisfy both parties.
Interview Questions
What are the different dispute resolution techniques available for use in construction and built environment projects?
Some of the dispute resolution techniques include mediation, arbitration, litigation, negotiation, and adjudication.
How does mediation differ from arbitration in the context of resolving construction disputes?
Mediation involves a neutral third party assisting the parties in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement, while arbitration involves an arbitrator making a binding decision after hearing evidence from both sides.
What role does negotiation play in dispute resolution in construction projects?
Negotiation is often the first step in resolving a dispute, where parties attempt to come to a mutually acceptable solution without involving third parties.
When is adjudication typically used as a dispute resolution technique in construction?
Adjudication is commonly used for resolving payment disputes or disputes related to technical issues during the construction process.
What are the key benefits of using mediation as a dispute resolution technique in construction projects?
Mediation is known for being cost-effective, preserving relationships between parties, and allowing for flexible solutions tailored to the specific situation.
In what circumstances would it be advisable to pursue litigation for a construction dispute?
Litigation is typically sought when parties cannot reach a resolution through negotiation or alternative methods, and when legal remedies are necessary.
How does arbitration in construction disputes differ from traditional court proceedings?
Arbitration is often faster, more confidential, and less formal than court proceedings, offering parties more control over the process and outcome.
What are the potential downsides of choosing arbitration as a dispute resolution method in construction projects?
Some drawbacks of arbitration include limited opportunities for appeal, potential for high costs, and the binding nature of the arbitrator’s decision.
In what ways can a project manager effectively prepare for potential disputes in construction projects?
Effective preparation involves documenting agreements, maintaining clear communication, understanding contractual obligations, and being aware of potential risk factors.
Why is it important for construction professionals to have a strong understanding of dispute resolution techniques?
Having a strong grasp of dispute resolution methods allows professionals to effectively manage conflicts, minimize project delays, and protect the interests of all parties involved.
extutorials.com