Risk management is integral to successful project management, and the PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) exam is specifically designed to equip professionals with the required knowledge and skills. One of the essential elements that PMI-RMP candidates must comprehend is how to evaluate and continually reassess organizational risks.
Organizational risks refer to potential events or conditions that may negatively impact a company or enterprise. Most organizations face a variety of risks, including strategic, compliance, operational, financial, and reputational risks. Effective risk management strategies can help manage these risks optimally.
Continual Risk Assessment
Organizations, regardless of their size or industry, operate in dynamic environments. Changes in the operational context, such as new competitors, regulatory fluctuations, shifts in customer preferences, or even internal changes like employee turnover, can influence identified risks or create new ones. Therefore, there’s a constant need to re-evaluate organizational risks, and this happens at three levels:
- Detection of new risks: This involves scanning the strategic landscape identifying any new potential hazards that might impact the organization’s objectives or people. Comprehensive risk identification techniques, such as risk brainstorming, Delphi technique, SWOT analysis, or scenario analysis, can be adopted.
- Monitoring existing risks: The risk landscape is not static; old risks can change in their likelihood of occurrence or potential impact. Monitoring is about proactively managing identified risks by tracking their performance, reviewing risk response strategies, and verifying the effectiveness of risk control measures.
- Ongoing risk assessment and analysis: This involves continually evaluating risks based on their probability of occurrence and potential impact. PMI-RMP candidates should be familiar with quantitative and qualitative risk analysis techniques and tools like Monte Carlo simulation, sensitivity analysis, decision tree analysis, and risk probability and impact assessment.
Real World Example: COVID-19 Scenario
As an example, consider the global pandemic situation caused by COVID-19. Most organizations hadn’t initially identified this as a potential risk. However, as the situation evolved, businesses had to quickly identify, evaluate, and manage this new risk. Using tools like SWOT analysis, they could see the Threat posed by the pandemic (T), the Weaknesses it exposed in their operations (W), the Opportunities it presented (like a shift to remote work or e-commerce), and their Strengths that helped cope (S).
In adequately monitoring and reassessing the risk, these organizations had to continually assess the impact of COVID-19 on their operations and adapt their responses accordingly, whether that involved revising work protocols or altering business strategies.
The Bottom Line
In conclusion, continual risk re-evaluation is not just about ticking a box in a risk management process; it’s a crucial activity that safeguards the organization’s objectives and facilitates its growth. Mastering this ongoing activity, along with the other facets of enterprise risk management, can help PMI-RMP candidates not only ace the exam but also contribute valuable expertise to their organizations.
Practice Test
True or False: Re-evaluating organizational risks is a one-time action that takes place at the beginning of every project.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: Re-evaluating organizational risks is not a one-time action. It is an ongoing activity that should be performed throughout the lifespan of the project. Risks can change or new ones can emerge at any point during the project.
In risk re-evaluation, which of the following processes should be repeated?
- a. Identification of risks
- b. Qualitative risk analysis
- c. Quantitative risk analysis
- d. All of the above
Answer: d. All of the above
Explanation: In risk re-evaluation, all these processes are repeated to redefine the risk events and reassess the level of risk considering the changing situation or status of the project.
Who is the main facilitator for regular risk re-evaluations?
- a. Stakeholders
- b. Risk management team
- c. Project manager
- d. None of the above
Answer: c. Project manager
Explanation: The project manager is the main facilitator for carrying out regular risk re-evaluations. Although other team members and stakeholders contribute, the responsibility of driving the risk re-evaluation process lies with the project manager.
Which of the following is NOT a reason for re-evaluating organizational risks?
- a. To update risk management strategies
- b. To assess whether risks have changed over time
- c. To identify new risks
- d. To analyse cost overruns
Answer: d. To analyse cost overruns
Explanation: Re-evaluating risks is done to update strategies, assess if risks have changed, and identify new risks. Analyzing cost overruns, although a project management activity, is not directly related to risk re-evaluation.
True or False: Re-evaluating risks does not contribute to improving project outcomes.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: Risk re-evaluation plays a crucial role in improving project outcomes. Continuous monitoring and reassessing of risks allow for the adjustment of strategies to mitigate those risks and ultimately improve project outcomes.
Which of these is a tool used to re-evaluate organizational risks?
- a. Brainstorming
- b. The risk register
- c. SWOT analysis
- d. All of the above
Answer: d. All of the above
Explanation: All these tools can be used for re-evaluating risks. Brainstorming can help identify new risks, the risk register can help reassess known risks, and a SWOT analysis can help evaluate threats and opportunities.
The result of the risk re-evaluation process should be documented in the:
- a. Project charter
- b. Risk register
- c. Project plan
- d. Work breakdown structure
Answer: b. Risk register
Explanation: The risk register is a document where all details of identified and re-evaluated risks are recorded, including the results of risk analysis and risk response planning.
True or False: Re-evaluating organizational risks contributes to proactive decision making.
- True
- False
Answer: True
Explanation: Risk re-evaluation helps the project team understand the changes in the risk situation, allowing them to anticipate necessary responses and thus enabling proactive decision making.
Risk re-evaluation should be performed:
- a. Only when a significant issue arises
- b. On a regularly scheduled basis
- c. At the end of the project
- d. When stakeholders request it
Answer: b. On a regularly scheduled basis
Explanation: It is best practice to re-evaluate risks on a regular basis (could be monthly, quarterly, etc.) throughout the life of the project to ensure that project management strategies are in line with the current risk status.
Who should be involved in the re-evaluation of organizational risks?
- a. Only the risk management team
- b. Project manager and stakeholders
- c. Only project managers
- d. All project team members
Answer: d. All project team members
Explanation: All team members should be involved in risk re-evaluations. Different perspectives might bring light to new risks or changes in existing ones.
Interview Questions
Why is it important to regularly re-evaluate organizational risks?
Regular re-evaluation of organizational risks is essential to understand and mitigate any potential threats that could negatively impact the organization’s objectives. This process helps in identifying new risks and evaluating the changes in previously identified risks.
What is the role of risk management process in the re-evaluation of organizational risks?
The risk management process serves as a guide to reassess the threats, opportunities, and uncertainties an organization may face. It involves constantly monitoring and controlling potential risks.
Describe the tools and techniques used for risk re-evaluation?
The commonly used tools and techniques include risk audits, risk reassessment, variance and trend analysis, technical performance measurement, reserve analysis, and status meetings.
Why is risk reassessment necessary in project management?
Risk reassessment is vital to revisit the probability and impact of identified risks, see if any risk responses have been effective and to discover any new risks.
How does a risk audit differ from reassessment in the context of re-evaluating organizational risks?
A risk audit examines and evaluates the effectiveness of the risk management process, while risk reassessment involves identifying and re-evaluating the existing risks, along with discovering new risks that might crop up as the project progresses.
How is risk re-evaluation related to the risk response plan?
The outcome of risk re-evaluation lets the organization update its risk response plan. This could involve changing the plan to manage a risk, identifying new risks, or closing out risks that no longer exist.
What factors could make necessary a re-evaluation of organizational risks?
Major changes in organizational structure, capabilities, processes, or external environment such as regulatory changes, market forces, or technological advancements can necessitate a re-evaluation of organizational risks.
Who is responsible for re-evaluating organizational risks in a project team?
The project Risk Management Team, including the Project Manager, is primarily responsible for re-evaluating organizational risks. However, it should be a collective effort involving all team members and stakeholders.
Define Variance Analysis in the context of risk re-evaluation.
Variance analysis is a quantitative investigation of the difference between actual and planned behavior. It allows for effective cost control, schedule control, and resource allocation, aiding in the re-evaluation of risks.
How does technical performance measurement assist in the re-evaluation of risks?
Technical performance measurement compares technical accomplishments during project execution to the project management plan. Deviations might signify potential risks or show where existing risk is greater than expected.
What is the significance of status meetings in the re-evaluation of organizational risks?
Status meetings offer a platform to discuss risk events, risk response effectiveness, and to identify emerging risks which are all significant in re-evaluating organizational risks.
What is the primary objective of re-evaluating organizational risks?
The main objective is to ensure that the risk management strategy stays effective in minimizing potential risks that could hinder the organization from achieving its goals.
Why is it important to document the results of risk re-evaluation?
Documenting results make it possible for the organization to trace the history of each risk, including its characterization, how it was managed, and the effectiveness of risk responses.
What is risk maturity and its importance in the process of re-evaluating organizational risks?
Risk maturity refers to the readiness level of an organization to deal with risks. A higher level of risk maturity implies a better capability to manage risks effectively, making it crucial in re-evaluating organizational risks.
How can an organization know when to re-evaluate their risks?
It is advisable to re-evaluate risks after significant changes in the operating environment or after a predefined period. However, continual monitoring is advised to detect changes that can alter risk.
extutorials.com