These changes can have far-reaching implications for the program hence it is essential to conduct impact assessments before implementation. Effectively, these assessments can help guide decisions and obtain necessary approvals in line with the governance model.
1. Understanding Impact Assessment In Program Changes
The impact assessment in program changes involves identifying, assessing, and managing all the potential risks and the effects these changes may bring. It provides a systematic approach to explore the aftermath of particular changes to the program. Therefore, it’s an integral part of the Program Management Professional (PgMP) exam.
Importance of Impact Assessment:
- Reduces Uncertainty: From environmental turbulence to market fluctuations, too many variables can affect the outcome of a program. Impact assessments can help understand these changes, prioritize them, and then frame appropriate strategies.
- Aids Decision-Making: By weighing the pros and cons of the program changes, impact assessments enable accurate decision making.
- Ensures Compliance: It ensures that appropriate procedures have been followed in line with the established governance model and aids in the process of securing required approvals.
2. Steps To Conduct Impact Assessment
Here are the steps a PgMP candidate can follow to conduct an effective impact assessment:
- Problem Identification: Identify the key issues and consider all the potential impacts of the proposed change. Ask what the change intends to achieve, what it adds to the current process, and who the stakeholders are.
- Impact Analysis: Determine the impact of changes on various areas of the program such as schedule, cost, risk, and stakeholder participation. This involves a comprehensive scrutiny of the pros and cons.
- Evaluation & Recommendation: Evaluate the implications of the impacts, align them with the program goals, and then make potent recommendations that best serve the program’s intent.
- Making Decisions: Based on the impact assessment, decisions are made to incorporate changes, and with the help of a structured governance model, steps should be taken to get the necessary approvals.
3. Example of Impact Assessment
Let’s consider an example. A program manager has been asked to speed up the implementation process to get the product to the market earlier. The program team identifies the potential problems: possible increase in cost, the risk of compromising quality, and intensified workload for team members.
The impact analysis shows that while fast-tracking may lead to a swift market entry, the increased costs may affect the overall profitability. There is also a risk of reducing quality that might negatively impact long-term market reputation.
After evaluating the impacts against program objectives, the program manager consults with the governance body. They decide it’s better to avoid changes and stay with the initial schedule. The decision is then documented and communicated to all stakeholders.
4. Framework of Governance Model
The governance model incorporates the decision-making process and is essential to confirm the alignment of the proposed changes with the program objectives. It typically involves these elements:
- Principles: The foundation of the governance model, it states the basic ‘laws’ guiding the program.
- Decision Making Entities: These are the stakeholders involved in making crucial decisions.
- Processes: The step-by-step procedures followed to achieve the program objectives.
- People: Refers to the stakeholders who will drive the processes.
By assessing the impacts of program changes and aligning these with the governance model, PgMP candidates demonstrate their ability to manage potential risks effectively. This requires not only a deep understanding of the program management principles but also a keen insight into anticipating potential impacts.
Practice Test
True or False: Impact assessments for program changes are not essential in Program Management.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: Impact assessments are crucial for understanding the potential effects of changes and ensuring program success.
Choosing suitable methods to document and review the impact of program changes is:
- a. The responsibility of the program sponsor
- b. The duty of the program manager
- c. An irrelevant job
Answer: b. The duty of the program manager
Explanation: The program manager is responsible for conducting impact assessments, documenting their effects, and making recommendations for program changes.
The governance model:
- a. Specifies the decision-making processes and authorities
- b. Is unclear about the decision-making processes and authorities
- c. Does not play a substantial role in program management
Answer: a. Specifies the decision-making processes and authorities
Explanation: The governance model is crucial in program management as it defines who has the authority to make decisions and how these decisions are made.
True or False: The aim of conducting impact assessments is to blindly execute changes in the program.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: The goal of impact assessments is to understand the possible outcomes of changes in the program and implement them while minimizing unintended consequences.
From the perspective of the governance model, the final decision for proposed changes is made by:
- a. The project manager
- b. The project team
- c. The governance board
Answer: c. The governance board
Explanation: According to the governance model, the governance board has the authority to make the final decision on proposed changes.
True or False: Recommendations based on impact assessments do not influence program decisions.
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: Recommendations resulting from impact assessments directly guide program decisions and assist in gaining approvals.
Can the effects of potential change be both positive and negative?
- a. Yes
- b. No
Answer: a. Yes
Explanation: Both positive and negative impacts can result from changes, and both should be evaluated during an impact assessment.
The use of impact assessments for program changes provides:
- a. Context
- b. Understanding
- c. Justification for decision-making
- d. All of the above
Answer: d. All of the above
Explanation: Impact assessments provide the necessary context, understanding, and justification for change-related decisions in program management.
Impact assessments for program changes are only necessary when the program is not moving as planned. True or False?
- True
- False
Answer: False
Explanation: Impact assessments should be completed whenever a change is proposed, regardless of how well the program is progressing.
In accordance with the governance model, who has the power to approve or deny changes?
- a. Program manager
- b. Team members
- c. Governance board
Answer: c. Governance board
Explanation: The governance board, as defined by the governance model, possesses the final authority to approve or decline changes.
Interview Questions
What is an impact assessment in the context of program management?
An impact assessment in program management is a systematic approach to evaluate the possible changes a new program or alteration in an existing program could make. It includes studying the pros, cons, and risks associated with the proposed changes.
Why is it necessary to conduct impact assessments for program changes?
Impact assessments are conducted to understand the potential effects and risks associated with introducing changes to a program. These assessments help in making informed decisions whether these changes should be implemented or not based on their predicted impact.
How would you describe a governance model in management professions?
A governance model lays out the structure and relationships that dictate how a organization runs. It provides a framework for the decision-making process, setting the manner and level of oversight and control.
How would you link impact assessments with decision approval in accordance with a governance model?
The impact assessment provides the insights necessary for informed decision-making within a governance model. Based on the results of the assessment, program managers can make recommendations on whether to proceed or alter the proposed changes, which are then approved or denied as per the processes defined in the governance model.
What components of a program change should be evaluated during an impact assessment?
The components to be evaluated during an impact assessment may include the scope of change, potential risks, benefits, organizational readiness, cost implications, available resources, timelines, and impact on stakeholders.
What role does a program manager play in the impact assessment process?
The program manager conducts the impact assessment, oversees the evaluation process, analyzes the outputs, and makes change recommendations based on results. They also have a responsibility to ensure the team understands the change and its implications.
How can you measure the effectiveness of an impact assessment?
The effectiveness of an impact assessment can be measured by how accurately it can predict the impacts and mitigate risks, as well as by its contribution to the decision-making process.
How do the outcomes of an impact assessment influence the approval process of program changes?
The outcomes of an impact assessment form the basis for the decision-making process. If the assessment predicts positive impacts and minimal risks, the approval process for the changes is usually straightforward. However, if risks are high, leaders might require the program manager to re-evaluate or change their strategies.
How important is stakeholder involvement during the impact assessment?
Stakeholder involvement is crucial since they often possess necessary insights about the potential impacts of changes. Their feedback can thus enhance the accuracy of an impact assessment.
Can you explain the consequences if impact assessments are not conducted?
Without impact assessments, organizations might implement changes that end up causing unintended consequences, including increased costs, delays, and stakeholder dissatisfaction. It can also lead to ineffective change management and program failure.
What are some common strategies employed for risk mitigation during an impact assessment?
Risk mitigation strategies might include risk avoidance, transfer, acceptance, reduction, or sharing. The appropriate strategy is determined after careful evaluation of the identified risks.
How does impact assessment tie into broader change management practices?
Impact assessment is a critical part of change management. It helps to evaluate the feasibility and effects of proposed changes, thereby informing the plan for managing and implementing those changes.
How is the governance model updated in response to the results of impact assessments?
Based on the results of the impact assessment, the governance model might need to be updated to allow for new processes, amend existing ones, or make other modifications necessary to reflect the proposed changes.
How do you ensure an impact assessment is objectively performed?
To ensure objectivity in an impact assessment, it’s crucial to have a clear framework and criteria for evaluation. Also, it’s beneficial if the assessment is conducted by an unbiased team or a third-party, if feasible.
What is the role of communication throughout the impact assessment process?
Communication plays a critical role in the impact assessment process. It is essential for sharing the purpose of the assessment, obtaining necessary inputs, discussing results, and ensuring that everyone involved understands the decisions made based on the assessment results.
extutorials.com